Thursday, October 31, 2019

Syria: Islamic State brides “unleash reign of terror,” slaughtering babies, dousing people with petrol

Syria: Islamic State brides “unleash reign of terror,” slaughtering babies, dousing people with petrol

Note that this story was reported before the death of Islamic State caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. The al-Hawl camp is home to 68,000 Islamic State families. It is same camp in which infamous Islamic State bride Shamima Begum was discovered. She was part of the rifle toting morality police, but was made out by her defenders to be a victim. Most important to note in this story is just how dangerous and as sinister as their male counterparts, Islamic State brides are, while social justice warriors fight for their return, painting them to be victims of their jihadist husbands. The Sun reported:
Female members of ISIS’ morality police al-Hisbah have unleashed a reign of terror within the Syrian camp by enforcing the terrorist group’s radical laws upon the population.
Their actions include “ slaughtering babies and dousing guards in petrol,” and not only guards, but women, too:
Aylul Rizgar, 30, is the camp’s senior administrator and has been repeatedly threatened with decapitation.
She told The Times: “I have lost count of the number of times the women here have told me that when Islamic State returns they’ll cut my head off and put it on a pole.”
She has also been attacked by a mum and her two daughters who bit her and doused her in petrol.
In another testimony that further demonstrates the level of danger that Islamic State brides pose to the West, a teen sex slave, Muna, described the cruelty and viciousness of Islamic States brides as she spoke of the capture of American aid worker Kayla Mueller.
Yazidi schoolgirl Muna revealed al-Baghdadi was so terrified his other wives would discover he had taken the American aid worker as his bride he banished her to prison.
The 26-year-old was held captive at the home of his deputy Abu Sayaff …..
When they first captured Kayla, ISIS fighters pulled her nails out…..She was forced to convert to Islam.
She [Muna] said al-Baghdadi had feared his wives reaction to Kayla as they were “worse than” him.
“The wives were always worse than al-Baghdadi…They were always telling the children that they were lazy and beating them…”
Pari Ibrahim, executive director of the Free Yezidi Foundation, warns that Islamic State brides are “not innocent bystanders.” She states:
“There has been no effort to understand why these ISIS brides are guilty…In some cases, [the wives] would lock our Yazidi women in the houses so they could not escape. They would force them to do manual labor, humiliate them in captivity; they were beaten and tortured by the ISIS wives.”
The dilemma of what to do with Islamic State brides and their caliphate cubs remains. Islamic State jihadists are enemy combatants, brutes and abusers of the worst kind, and their brides are no better; caution should be employed in considerations of whether they should be repatriated back to the West, which they view as enemy territory, not as their “home.”
“ISIS takes ‘full control’ of al-Hawl camp slaughtering babies and dousing guards in petrol as they vow to restart jihad,” by Alahna Kindred, The Sun, October 24, 2019:
ISIS has taken control of the Al-Hawl camp and has wasted no time slaughtering babies and dousing guards in petrol, it has been reported.
Female members of ISIS’ morality police al-Hisbah have unleashed a reign of terror within the Syrian camp by enforcing the terrorist group’s radical laws upon the population.
Al-Hisbah have ordered attacks against guards, burnt down tents, dismembered bodies, doused women in petrol and have smuggled guns into the camp as ISIS vowed to restart their jihad.
The number of jihadists escaping the camp has skyrocketed and those who are recaptured have admitted to wanting to join the Turkish-backed Islamic militants.
Aylul Rizgar, 30, is the camp’s senior administrator and has been repeatedly threatened with decapitation.
She told The Times: “I have lost count of the number of times the women here have told me that when Islamic State returns they’ll cut my head off and put it on a pole.”
She has also been attacked by a mum and her two daughters who bit her and doused her in petrol.
Al-Hawl is home to 68,000 ISIS family members after they fled the jihadists’ last stand in Baghouz earlier this year.
Among its residents include 10,100 foreign citizens, including 18 British women and children – and was where ISIS bride Shamima Begum was found in February…..

Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Nikki Haley: Just when you thought Bernie Sanders couldn’t get any more radical, he outdid himself. He wants to take money we give to Israel to defend itself from terrorists, and give it to Gaza, which is run by terrorists?? Unreal. Why isn’t every other Dem pres candidate saying he’s wrong?

Nikki HaleyVerifierat konto


Former U.S. Ambassador to the UN. 116th Governor of South Carolina.  Tiger. Proud American 🇺🇸.

Canary Mission: Meet The Anti-Semitic Hosts Of The National SJP Conference

Canary Mission documents people and groups that promote hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews on North American college campuses.

Canary Mission investigates hatred across the entire political spectrum, including the far right, far left and anti-Israel activists.

Every individual and organization has been carefully researched and sourced. If you appreciate the work of Canary Mission, help us continue to expose hatred by alerting us to anti-Semitic activity on your college campus.

7-year-old on PA children’s TV: I learned “the art of the rifle,” “Abbas... my blood is your blood”

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this video do not represent those of Palestinian Media Watch. PMW monitors and exposes this material, in order to educate and eliminate hate and terror promotion. For more info, visit: Lyrics: "[Arafat] you are the rifle and I am the one who learned its art O [PA President] Mahmoud Abbas, walk on and don't worry... By Allah, my blood is your blood You are the history of wonders And if someone petty rushes to condemn you, don't worry about the dogs… [Arafat,] you are the morning of the Martyrs You are the evening of the Martyrs You are the source of the gallantry You are the storm of combat." [Official PA TV, The Best Home, Sept. 5, 2019]

About PMW

PMW believes that the key to the future is peace education. Our research, however, shows that Palestinian children have not been given that key. More than two decades since the signing of the Oslo Accords, the Palestinian Authority is still actively poisoning the minds of its children with hate.
Founded in 1996, Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) is a non-profit Israeli research institute known internationally for its in-depth research of Palestinian society from a broad range of perspectives. PMW’s findings are sought after by governments, legislators, media outlets, and decision-makers worldwide and have played a central role in correcting inaccurate narratives about the Israel-Palestinian conflict.
PMW's reports on the Palestinian Authority's promotion and glorification of terror -- which include paying salaries to terrorists; naming schools, sporting events, and public spaces after terrorists; promoting terror in children's TV programs and schoolbooks, and so much more -- have fundamentally changed the way the world sees the Palestinian Authority.
PMW's exceptional team of Arabic language researchers spends countless hours monitoring, translating, and analyzing PA-controlled newspapers, TV shows, radio programs, social media sites, and schoolbooks to understand the messages the Palestinian Authority and other Palestinian leaders send to their people.
Translated from the original Arabic source, PMW's findings document a decades-long pattern of the Palestinian Authority's indoctrination of adults and children to seek Shahada (Martyrdom), while denying Israel's right to exist and anticipating a world without Israel.
PMW is the organization that uncovered and notified donor countries that the Palestinian Authority rewards terrorism by paying salaries to terrorist prisoners and money to the families of terrorist “Martyrs” totaling hundreds of millions of dollars every year. PMW’s research led to the US Taylor Force Act and Israel’s “Anti-Pay-for-Slay” law and impacted funding policies in a multitude of countries.
PMW's yearly presentations to the Israeli government, US Congress, and many parliaments have led to numerous parliamentary debates, policy decisions, and legislation concerning the Palestinian Authority. PMW’s work has been instrumental in propelling Australia, Belgium, Britain, France, Holland, Norway, the US, and other countries to publicly condemn the PA for glorifying hate and terror and to cut funding to the Palestinian Authority and Palestinian projects promoting or glorifying terror as a means to pressure the Palestinian Authority to change.
PMW also reaches hundreds of thousands of people worldwide through its bulletins and special reports and millions more through international news outlets and social media sites covering PMW’s work. By demonstrating the direct link between the Palestinian Authority's messaging and Palestinian hate and terrorism, PMW has provided clear evidence that it is Palestinian Authority, not Israel, that is perpetuating the conflict by promoting hate and terror and denying Israel’s right to exist in any borders.
It is PMW’s intention that governments and key-decision makers worldwide will use PMW’s research to address the real obstacles to peace and develop effective solutions that focus on the fundamental changes the Palestinian Authority must make before there can be any chance of peace.

Who's Who at PMW

Itamar Marcus PhotoItamar Marcus, Founder and Director
Itamar Marcus is one of the foremost authorities on Palestinian ideology and policy. He regularly testifies and lectures to members of US Congress and parliaments, senior security officials, and decision-makers around the world and is a sought-after speaker at international conferences and universities. He has also provided analysis on CNN, FOX News, BBC, and a full range of world news outlets.
Marcus founded PMW in 1996, to determine whether the Palestinian Authority was honoring its commitments to the 1993 Oslo Accords and leading its people towards peace. He was appointed by the Israel Government to represent Israel in negotiations with the Palestinian Authority on incitement in 1999. He also served as Director of Research at the Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace from 1998 to 2001, where he wrote reports on Palestinian Authority, Syrian and Jordanian schoolbooks. In 2013 and 2015, the Israeli Foreign Ministry appointed Marcus to co-chair the section on the Muslim and Arab world at the Global Conferences on Antisemitism.
Marcus has published hundreds of reports and articles on Palestinian society, education, and media, with a special focus on the degree to which the Palestinian Authority is or is not preparing its people for peace. His book Deception: Betraying the Peace Process, co-authored with Nan Jacques Zilberdik, was acclaimed "one of the most important books you’ll handle in your lives” by Robert Bernstein (z'l), founder of Human Rights Watch and Chief Executive of Random House.
Marcus was recognized among the world’s "top 100 people positively influencing Jewish life or the State of Israel" by The Algemeiner newspaper, and was awarded the “Abramowitz Israeli Prize for Media Criticism” by Israel Media Watch "for outstanding coverage of the Palestinian Authority.” He was honored at the Endowment for Middle East Truth’s annual Rays of Light dinner, and awarded the Zionist Organization of America’s “Ben Hecht Award for Outstanding Journalism.”

Nan Jacques Zilberdik photoNan Jacques Zilberdik, Senior Analyst
Nan Jacques Zilberdik joined PMW in 2008, and as Senior Analyst has written hundreds of PMW bulletins, special reports, and op-eds. She co-authored Deception: Betraying the Peace Process with Itamar Marcus, which was acclaimed "one of the most important books you’ll handle in your lives” by Robert Bernstein (z'l), founder of Human Rights Watch and Chief Executive of Random House.
Nan has presented PMW findings, to members of US Congress and many European Parliaments, and has been interviewed by news outlets around the world.

Maurice photoMaurice Hirsch, Adv., Director of Legal Strategies
Maurice Hirsch is an International Law expert who specializes in the prosecution of terrorists, the Palestinian Authority, and International Law as applied in Judea and Samaria.                  
Prior to joining PMW in 2017, Hirsch served in a number of senior positions in the IDF’s Military Advocate General’s Corps., including Assistant to the Legal Advisor to Judea and Samaria; Head of Legal Advice to the Navy, Air Force, Ground Forces and Home Front; and ultimately as the Head of the Military Prosecution for Judea and Samaria. He retired from the IDF after 19 years of service at the rank of Lieutenant Colonel.
During his military service, Hirsch dealt extensively with different aspects of Palestinian terrorism and led a number of initiatives focused on battling terrorism. In 2013/14, he represented the Israeli army and the State of Israel in talks with a UN organization, leading to the UN rewriting a controversial report about Israel.

Ronit photo
Ronit Ansbacher, Director of Press and Public Affairs
Ronit Ansbacher joined PMW in 2008, and runs PMW’s press relations and communications division, building bridges to media outlets worldwide.
Prior to PMW, Ansbacher served for nine years as International Relations Manager for The Israel Project in Jerusalem, where she established and ran a diplomatic outreach program for foreign diplomats based in Israel, among other duties. During her 20 year career, Ronit has specialized in political public relations, crisis communications, and strategic communications.

PMW Arabic-language Researchers
PMW’s outstanding team of 11 Arabic language researchers is the basis for PMW’s critical work and impact. They are experts in Arabic with many years of study and experience, including university degrees and working as Arabic translators in the Israeli army and as Arabic language news reporters. For those born in Arab countries, Arabic is their mother tongue. Most have been with PMW for five years or more, including some who have been with the organization since its founding.
Our Arabic language researchers spend hours a day researching, monitoring, and analyzing Palestinian Authority-controlled newspapers, TV shows, radio programs, social media sites, and schoolbooks to understand the messages the Palestinian Authority and other Palestinian leaders send to their people. Their findings, which are translated into English and Hebrew, form the basis of PMW's bulletins and reports exposing the Palestinian Authority"s messages and activities promoting hate and terror. PMW disseminates these findings to government officials, decision-makers, journalists, NGOs, and others all over the world.

Fox News: Jim Jordan makes explosive accusation against Schiff

GOP Reps. Jim Jordan and Steve Scalise condemn Intel Committee Chair Adam Schiff, accusing him of blocking witness testimony at today's closed-door impeachment hearing. #FoxNews
FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC), FOX Business Network (FBN), FOX News Radio, FOX News Headlines 24/7, and the direct-to-consumer streaming service, FOX Nation. FOX News also produces FOX News Sunday on FOX Broadcasting Company and FOX News Edge. A top five-cable network, FNC has been the most watched news channel in the country for 17 consecutive years. According to a 2018 Research Intelligencer study by Brand Keys, FOX News ranks as the second most trusted television brand in the country. Additionally, a Suffolk University/USA Today survey states Fox News is the most trusted source for television news or commentary in the country, while a 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News is the top-cited outlet. FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape while routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.
Subscribe to Fox News!
Watch more Fox News Video:
Watch Fox News Channel Live:
Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five:
Special Report with Bret Baier:
The Story with Martha Maccallum:
Tucker Carlson Tonight:
The Ingraham Angle:
Fox News @ Night:
Follow Fox News on Facebook:
Follow Fox News on Twitter:
Follow Fox News on Instagram:

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

‘Brazil Needs China’: Bolsonaro Embraces Communist Money on Beijing Trip - Breitbart News Network

To read the entire item, kindly click on this link:

‘Brazil Needs China’: Bolsonaro Embraces Communist Money on Beijing Trip


Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro – who campaigned as a hardline anti-communist against China’s invasion of the Brazilian economy – signed eight trade agreements with dictator Xi Jinping on Friday.

Bolsonaro, in Beijing for a visit in preparation for this year’s BRICS summit in Brasilia, told reporters that “Brazil needs China, and China needs Brazil,” urging Chinese companies to invest in the South American nation.
Bolsonaro proclaimed that his country and the communist dictatorship were “completely aligned, in a way that reaches beyond our commercial and business relationship.”
Bolsonaro and Xi signed eight agreements, according to Brazil’s O Globo newspaper, after an extensive communist military pageant in Tiananmen Square, home to one of the bloodiest massacres in the history of dictatorships worldwide.
Bolsonaro eased restrictions for Chinese nationals visiting Brazil and signed a deal allowing more Chinese students into the country, who have attempted to violently impose the Communist Party’s ideology in universities in Australia and other free states. As a presidential candidate, Bolsonaro campaigned on eradicating Marxist ideology from schools.
Bolsonaro also signed trade agreements involving processed beef, cottonseed meal for livestock feed, renewable energy projects, and access to Brazil’s vast natural resources.
“Brazil is a sea of opportunity for China,” Bolsonaro said. “Brazil needs China, and China needs Brazil.”
The Brazilian government has invited Chinese state-owned companies to participate in an auction for rights to offshore oil access in November, despite China’s atrocious environmental record and its history of using state-owned companies to strongarm foreign entities into silence over its human rights abuses.
No reports indicate at press time that Bolsonaro challenged the communist regime on its widespread intellectual property theft, its use of concentration camps to eliminate ethnic Muslim minorities, the use of slave labor in concentration camps to manufacture products sold worldwide, police brutality against anti-communist protesters in Hong Kong, a growing crackdown on Chinese Christians nationwide, the live harvesting of organs from political prisoners for sale on the black market, or China’s support for the rogue regime in Venezuela, which borders Brazil.
“When I passed through Taiwan, I was just a lawmaker and there was no misunderstanding in my opinion,” Bolsonaro said on Friday. “I spoke of one China and one Brazil, too.”
China has deep ties to Havana, having forgiven $6 billion in debt to the island – a gift to the regime – and brought it along for its sprawling Belt and Road Initiative. Chinese companies make millions doing business with Cuba’s colony, Venezuela, and Communist Party officials regularly advise the Maduro regime. Dictator Nicolás Maduro’s regime has described China, Russia, and Iran as the countries leading that regime’s foreign policy.
China is the world’s largest and, arguably, most repressive communist regime. It has banned the practice of any religion not directly managed by the Communist Party.
Follow Frances Martel on Facebook and Twitter.

President Donald J. Trump: How many more Never Trumpers will be allowed to testify about a perfectly appropriate phone call when all anyone has to do is READ THE TRANSCRIPT! I knew people were listening in on the call (why would I say something inappropriate?), which was fine with me, but why so many?

Donald J. TrumpVerifierat konto


45th President of the United States of America🇺🇸
Washington, DC

Christine Douglass-Williams, Jihad Watch: "Albania: Police foil Tehran-backed jihad terror plot at Sufi ceremony"

Albania: Police foil Tehran-backed jihad terror plot at Sufi ceremony

Albanian police have announced that they “thwarted an attack allegedly planned by a Tehran-backed ‘terrorist cell’ against opponents of the Iranian regime in the Balkan country last year. The cell belonged to the Quds Force, an elite unit of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) responsible for foreign operations.”
The target was a Sufi ceremony attended by members of the anti-IRGC group, the MEK (People’s Mujahedin of Iran). Since its exile from Iran in the early 1980s, the US-supported MEK has been committed to overthrowing the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The Obama administration that removed the MEK from the US terror list in 2012, and helped negotiate its relocation to Albania. This decision followed a massive lobbying campaign by the MEK to end its designation as a terrorist group “despite reports that implicated the group ‘in assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists as recently as 2012, along with its anti-Shah and anti-American activities during the Iranian revolution.'”
Iran targets anyone or any group anywhere that it deems to be an enemy or an obstacle to its expansion. Its proxies are global. The EU has accused it of plots to assassinate regime opponents in Europe. Its proxies have infiltrated Canada, with calls for attacks on the U.S. Its proxy Hizballah has also been expanding operations in Canada. Iran has “sought to export its revolution and empower Shiite groups in the Middle East.” At any time, Iran is in a position to “rally regional proxies” such as Hizballah if needed.
“Albanian Police Say Iranian ‘Terrorist’ Plot Foiled,” Radio Free Europe, October 23, 2019:
Albanian police thwarted an attack allegedly planned by a Tehran-backed “terrorist cell” against opponents of the Iranian regime in the Balkan country last year, police said on October 23.
The cell belonged to the Quds Force, an elite unit of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) responsible for foreign operations, police said in a statement.
This cell “had planned, among other things, a terrorist act foiled in March 2018” targeting a religious ceremony of the Bektashi, a Sufi group, in Tirana, the statement said.
The ceremony was attended by members of the exiled Iranian opposition group, the People’s Mujahedin of Iran (MEK), according to police.
Sufism, a mystical branch of Islam, is not illegal in Iran but rights groups accuse the Iranian government of harassment and discrimination against their followers.
In 2013, Albania agreed to take in some 3,000 members of the MEK at the request of Washington and the United Nations.
They currently live in a compound in northwestern Albania.
Police on October 23 published photos of three Iranians and one Turkish national allegedly involved in the “terrorist cell.”
The leader of the alleged cell “resides in Turkey” and another “has an Austrian passport,” the statement said.
Police declined to say whether international arrest warrants had been issued….

Christine Douglass-Williams
Christine Douglass-Williams is a nine-time international award-winning broadcast journalist and author of the book The Challenge of Modernizing IslamShe is a former Director with the Canadian Race Relations Foundation, appointed by the Harper Conservative government, but terminated by the Trudeau government for her writings against political Islam on Jihad Watch. She was also an advisor to the Conservative Government’s Office of Religious Freedom, shut down by the Trudeau Liberal government.
To book Christine Douglass-Williams to speak, write to

Hugh Fitzgerald, Jihad Watch: Marriage Jihad

Hugh Fitzgerald: Marriage Jihad (Part One)

One of the many ways that Muslims manage to enter and settle in the West is by marrying a Muslim who is already living in the West as a legal migrant or even as a citizen.
One version is that where Pakistani-British men return to Pakistan to find a bride, most often a cousin, who will be unused to Western ways, unlike Pakistani-British girls brought up in the U.K. For the Muslim girl, this arranged marriage appears not much different from the arranged marriage her family would otherwise make for her to a husband in Pakistan. In fact, she will come out ahead, because when her new husband brings her back to the U.K as his wife, even though she may live in a Muslim neighborhood, she will have more freedom of movement than would ever have been possible in Pakistan. She may acquire a better knowledge of English, offered by the generous welfare state of Britain. She may then have the further possibility of being able to work outside the house, depending on how liberal her husband is, and how great is the family’s need for money. She and her children will receive medical care far beyond what would have been possible in Pakistan. Her children will receive educations superior to anything they could get in Pakistan.
And in this way, many thousands of Pakistani girls and women are allowed into the U.K. each year — no one seems to know exactly how many — as the wives, in arranged  marriages, sometimes forced, of Muslim men already living in the country legally, thereby helping to increase the number of Muslims in Britain.
A different kind of arranged marriage is that where Muslim girls and women, who are legal migrants, or citizens, living in the U.K., are sent abroad by their families to marry Muslim men, who can return with them, as their husbands, on spousal visas. In order to make sure the girls are unable to back out from the marriages that have been arranged for them, the men deliberately rape and impregnate the girls, a way to seal the deal, and to prevent divorce, for the girls have now been rendered of less value — except to these “husbands” — on the marriage market. Furthermore, it is believed that a pregnant wife makes the marriage more legitimate in the eyes of British authorities.
These husbands from abroad now find that they are often (though not always) given that coveted thing, a spousal visa, by the Home Office, that allows them to remain in the U.K. as husbands of women who are legal migrants or  citizens. The couple can now be recipients of all the largesse the generous British welfare state provides. Their family can receive free or highly subsidized housing, free medical care, free education, family allowances, and more. But the main thing the men wanted they now have: they are able, with these spousal visas, to remain in the U.K.
Not all the women involved in these forced marriages are reconciled to their dismal lot. Some of these women have tried to get the British government to halt the practice of giving visas to their putative “husbands.”
Women and girls raped after being sent abroad, then Home Office lets illegal husbands settle in UK.
British teenagers are being forced to marry abroad and are raped and impregnated while the Home Office “turns a blind eye” by handing visas to their husbands, The Times has found.
Officials received dozens of reports last year that women wanted to block visas for men they had been made to marry in countries including Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and the United Arab Emirates. In almost half of their cases the visas were approved, records show.
Yvette Cooper, chairwoman of the home affairs select committee, said she would demand answers from the Home Office over the findings.
Experts believe that there are thousands of victims in Britain as the vast majority are too afraid to come forward….
Thus, while recognizing the nature of these forced marriages, designed to help the husbands obtain residence in the U.K., and having heard the testimony of many of the women who have been forced into these sham marriages, and heard, too, their pleas not to give their “husbands” visas, the Home Office has nonetheless continued to approve visas for these men. Why? Is it because they don’t mind offending Muslim women, but are worried about offending Muslim men? Are there Muslims working in the Home Office who are used to the idea of arranged — and forced — marriages, and do not consider such marriages to be “sham”? Where is the justification for approving these visas for men who, at the very least, have been accused by their “wives” of having raped them, and whose main interest is clearly not the marriage itself, but the ability to receive the spousal visas that will allow them to remain in the U.K.?
These “marriages” have involved girls as young as 11 who were sent abroad from the U.K.  Sometimes they are “married” using Skype. As noted above, the deliberate attempt to impregnate these girls not only makes them less marriageable to others, so that they are more likely to stay in this forced marriage, but also to make their own “marriage” more legitimate to British authorities. Another consideration is that by having their daughters marry Muslim men from abroad, who expect strict adherence to Islam, the parents hope that will change the behavior of their daughters, if they give signs of becoming too Western in their ways:
“Imams in the UK and abroad have been conducting ceremonies using Skype – so girls can be married remotely before “being put on a plane and consummating the marriage at the earliest opportunity”, according to Freedom, a charity.
The marriage is often conducted with the promise of a visa to the UK for their new husband, it said.
The reason is to curb the behavior of their children when they become ‘too western’,” charity founder Aneeta Prem was quoted as saying by ‘The Sunday Times’.
“Once married, there is enormous pressure to get a spouse visa. The hope is the girl will visit (country of husband’s origin) and fall pregnant to make the union seem more legitimate before bringing the partner back,” she said.
To sum up:
Muslim girls in the U.K. are being sent abroad and forced to marry Muslim men, often much older, whom they do not know, and who have already been chosen for them, for three reasons. First, in order to make sure that their behavior remains islamically correct, and does not become “too western.” Second, so that the men they marry will be able to enter, and remain in, the U.K., on a spousal visa. Third, in some cases, these husbands-to-be pay the families of the girls for the right to marry them, mainly in order to get the benefits of that visa.

Hugh Fitzgerald: Marriage Jihad (Part Two)

As we noted in Part One, some Muslim men — in the U.K. that means mostly Pakistanis  — also go abroad to find a wife selected by family members. Often the girl chosen is a cousin of the man, unsurprising in a culture that places such value on cousin-marriages. Having been raised in a Muslim land, the girl selected will, it is believed, be suitably docile, meek and mild, not having been influenced, as Muslim girls in the U.K. have been, by Western ways.
As for the girl in Pakistan who has been chosen by her family to marry a cousin from the U.K., for her an arranged marriage was inevitable, and she may see little difference between an arranged marriage with someone in Pakistan or with someone in the U.K., but should  come to realize that there are benefits to living in the U.K. British law provides a limit to Muslim misogyny: the husband cannot “beat” his wife for her supposed “disobedience.” Her children will receive Western educations, rather than being limited by a school syllabus saturated with Islam. Polygamy is forbidden. A husband cannot divorce merely by uttering the triple-talaq; under British law, a wife has the same rights to divorce as does a husband. All of this improves the wife’s condition.
These cousin-marriages, however, weigh heavily on health care in Great Britain, for they result in many more children with congenial defects, that cost the NHS (National Health Service) huge sums for lifetime care. Shouldn’t those marriages be discouraged by the British government?
At the very least, why doesn’t the Home Office engage in an information campaign, to discourage those marriages where it is the girls and women who are sent to Pakistan to be married? It could threaten to prosecute the family members who force girls and women to enter into arranged marriages abroad. It could spread the word that any girls or women who fear being the victims of such an arrangement can contact the Home Office for support, which would include warning family members not to proceed with forced marriages. It could take a hard line on “sham” marriages — marriages, that is, where the girl or woman had no say in the matter, and where wives are forcibly made pregnant (i.e., raped), to legitimize the marriage in the eyes of British authorities.
The Home Office could declare its willingness to prosecute the “husbands” in these marriages for sexual crimes, should they continue to force themselves on their “wives” once they are in the U.K. It could announce, too, that it is prepared to refuse to grant spousal visas to the “husbands” in these marriages, but instead will either deny them outright or, at most, provide a short-term visa that will remain valid only as long as it takes to investigate the legitimacy of such a marriage, to find out if it real or sham, and whether it violates any British law as, for example, would be the case with an underage bride.
How can the Home Office determine which marriages are “sham”? It can take the testimony of the girls and women involved, who can describe every step in the process of the forced-marriage, from their being selected to marry, sight unseen, a Muslim man against their will, to the marriage abroad, and the quick, forced consummation of that marriage, and then the return of the couple, to the U.K. What was the difference in age between the girl and her husband-to-be? Was the girl raped, or was the sex consensual? If she was raped, was it done in order that she would become pregnant, to “legitimize” the marriage?
The demographic jihad proceeds all over Europe, with both legal and illegal Muslim migrants. The “marriage jihad” is a small part of this larger phenomenon. These marriages could be reduced if the Home Office is willing to brave charges of “islamophobia” and to stop handing out spousal visas, but instead to thoroughly investigate these marriages. How did the “husband” first make contact with the family of his would-be wife? How long did he know her before they were married? What payments, if any, did he make to her  family? Were those payments contingent on his receiving a spousal visa? These are some of the obvious questions. These marriages where young girls are sent abroad to marry men, including those who are much older, in order that those “husbands” may receive spousal visas that allow them to settle in the U.K., are especially deplorable. Muslim women should be able to count on the protections of the Home Office. At this late date, why, one would like to know, can’t they?
Hugh Fitzgerald
Hugh Fitzgerald is a student of history and literature, primarily of America and Europe. He admires Jacques Barzun, J. D. Salinger, and Alan Bennett, reads dictionaries for profit and pleasure, and finds particularly appealing the words “recompense,” “quondam,” “magari,” and “degringolade.”
By far the best way to reach him is through the good offices, in every sense, of Robert Spencer; Fitzgerald has an email account, the address of which is, but almost never looks at it.
Before it’s too late for Western Europe and the United States, which gave birth to the traditions of freedom and equality of rights for all that shine today as lights in the entire world, this must be stopped. Therefore Jihad Watch seeks to bring public attention to:
  • The plight of the dhimmis, an immense but almost completely ignored ongoing scandal that continues in Muslim countries today;
  • The plight of women under Sharia provisions, similar to conditions imposed on dhimmis, in the denial of equal rights and dignity;
  • Slavery in Islamic lands, which continues today, justified by Sharia-‘s dhimmi codes;
  • The integral role of jihad and dhimmitude ideology in global terrorism today;
  • The license that academic and journalistic whitewashes of dhimmitude gives to radical jihadist enemies of human rights for all.
Jihad Watch fights to ensure that deeds done in the darkness for so long will not continue to be done. The light of world attention is anathema to the proponents of jihad and dhimmitude: we have seen in recent years that women sentenced to stoning for adultery, often victims of rape unjustly accused thanks to Sharia laws disallowing rape victims’ testimony, were freed following international outcry. Jihad Watch seeks to provoke similar, continuous and increasing outcry wherever and whenever the Sharia’s institutionalized injustices threaten dhimmis and women.
May the truth prevail.

Sunday, October 27, 2019

Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch: "Germany: Muslim hits his wife with a car, drags her 30 meters, smashes her with an axe"

Germany: Muslim hits his wife with a car, drags her 30 meters, smashes her with an axe

Domestic violence is common to all cultures, but only in Islam does it have divine sanction. A culture of violence, the foundational text of which commands men to beat women from whom they “fear disobedience” (Qur’an 4:34), is going to give rise to this sort of thing, just as that same foundational text’s calls for violence against unbelievers (2:191, 4:89, 9:5, 9:29, 47:4, etc.) are going to give rise to jihad violence.
“Limburg: Man smashes woman with an ax head – Rescue workers shocked,” translated from “Limburg: Mann zertrümmert Frau mit Axt den Kopf – Rettungskräfte schockiert,” Frankfurter Neue Presse, October 26, 2019 (thanks to Searchlight Germany):
Limburg – Hard-bitten policemen and firefighters, who have seen a lot of terrible things, are horrified. Rescue workers are shocked. The people in the region a little later were shocked and saddened. This bloody act is particularly cruel in how it unfolded and in its brutality. Behind a demolished car that has crushed a house wall, there is a woman lying with her skull smashed to pieces.
What happened?
Shortly after eight in the Weiersteinstraße, about 300 meters from the train station, a 34-year-old looks for his wife. He is sitting in his black Audi. At 8:25, he spots her on the sidewalk. The man accelerates and drives his car straight at the 31-year-old. The car dragged the victim around 30 meters: across the street, then across the parking lot of the Kreishandwerkerschaft, then through a heavy metal gate that had been accidentally left open, and finally crashed with great force into a Grade II listed brick building.
What happened after that in Limburg is stunning: the offender got out of the smoking car and seemingly calm, got an ax from the trunk. He grabbed the tool with both hands and struck five times with full force on the head of the defenseless victim. The unbelievable scenes were filmed by eyewitnesses and could be seen minutes later on social networks. The autopsy must clarify whether the woman was still alive before the attack with the axe.
A police patrol, on another order nearby, is quickly at the scene. The officials drew their weapons and the man was arrested without resistance.
The police and the fire brigade approached with a large contingent, closing off the crime scene in Limburg. However, the car and the body were clearly visible. A forensics team of the Kripo in white overalls took up the work. Investigators marked items that the victim has lost on impact: a brown handbag with a torn strap and a cell phone on the sidewalk, a sneaker in the middle of the road. The investigators spoke quickly of a relationship act.
Neighbors and business people from the area puzzled over the subject. The couple has lived in the Weiersteinstraße for three years, was always friendly and well-situated, they tell television crews. But they were mistaken, and described another couple that is still alive and well.
In fact, according to information from this newspaper, the spouses involved in this case have lived separately for a long time. He lives in their formerly common apartment near Mendig in Rhineland-Palatinate, about 70 kilometers from Limburg; she and their two children live in the Limburg women’s shelter. The man is of Tunisian ancestry and was born and raised in Germany; the Tunisian woman was a teacher….

ROBERT SPENCER is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is the author of nineteen books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) (Regnery Publishing) and The Truth About Muhammad (Regnery Publishing) and the bestselling The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS (Bombardier Books). Forthcoming in 2019 is The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process (Bombardier Books).
Spencer has led seminars on Islam and jihad for the FBI, the United States Central Command, United States Army Command and General Staff College, the U.S. Army’s Asymmetric Warfare Group, the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), the Justice Department’s Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council and the U.S. intelligence community. He has discussed jihad, Islam, and terrorism at a workshop sponsored by the U.S. State Department and the German Foreign Ministry.
Spencer is a weekly columnist for PJ Media and FrontPage Magazine, and has written many hundreds of articles about jihad and Islamic terrorism. His articles on Islam and other topics have appeared in the Los Angeles Times, the San Francisco Examiner, the New York Post, the Washington Times, the Dallas Morning NewsFox News OpinionNational ReviewThe FederalistThe Hill, the Detroit NewsTownHall.comReal Clear Religion, the Daily Caller, the New Criterion, the Journal of International Security Affairs, the UK’s Guardian, Canada’s National PostMiddle East QuarterlyWorldNet DailyFirst ThingsInsight in the NewsAleteia, and many other journals. For nearly ten years Spencer wrote the weekly Jihad Watch column at Human Events. He has also served as a consultant to the Center for Security Policy, a contributing writer to the Investigative Project on Terrorism, and as an Adjunct Fellow with the Free Congress Foundation.
Robert Spencer has been a featured speaker at the University of California-Irvine, Temple University, Dartmouth College, Penn State University, the University of California-Los Angeles, Stanford University, New York University, Brown University, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the University of Virginia, State University of New York-Binghamton, State University of New York-Stony Brook, Florida State University, DePaul University, the College of William and Mary, Washington University of St. Louis, the University of Wisconsin at Madison, the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, Boise State University, Cal Poly, Portland State University, and many other colleges and universities. He has also addressed the Heritage Foundation, Westminster Institute, the Gatestone Institute, the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Museum of Tolerance in New York City, the Hudson Institute, the Temple of the Arts in Los Angeles, the San Diego Jewish Book Fair, the Christian Rights and Freedom Institute, the Young Presidents’ Organization, Calvary Chapel Pacific Coast, the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), FreedomFest, Young America’s Foundation, Hershey’s Sweet Retreat, the John W. Pope Civitas Institute, the Conservative Forum of Silicon Valley, Train the Trainer, and many other audiences.
Spencer (MA, Religious Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) has been studying Islamic theology, law, and history in depth since 1980. His work has aroused the ire of the foes of freedom and their dupes: in October 2011, Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups wrote to Homeland Security Advisor (and current CIA director) John Brennan, demanding that Spencer be removed as a trainer for the FBI and military groups, which he taught about the belief system of Islamic jihadists; Brennan immediately complied as counter-terror training materials were scrubbed of all mention of Islam and jihad. Spencer has been banned by the British government from entering the United Kingdom for pointing out accurately that Islam has doctrines of violence against unbelievers. He has been invited by name to convert to Islam by a senior member of al-Qaeda.