Wednesday, September 06, 2017

Daniel Greenfield, The Point: The Left Chooses Islamic Nationalism In Burma Over Aung San Suu Kyi

Tuesday, March 01, 2005

About Me

My name is Daniel Greenfield. I am a blogger and columnist born in Israel and living in Los Angeles. I am a  Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

My original biweekly column appears at Front Page Magazineand my blog articles regularly appear at Family Security Matters, the Jewish PressTimes of IsraelAct for America andRight Side News, as well as daily at the Canada Free Press and a number of other outlets. I have a column titled Western Front at Israel National News and my op eds have also appeared in the New York Sun, the Jewish Press and at FOX Nation.

I was named one of the Jewish Press' Most Worthwhile Blogs from 2006-2011 and my writing has been cited by Rush Limbaugh, Melanie Philips, Robert Spencer, Daniel Pipes, Judith Klinghoffer, John Podhoretz, Jeff Jacoby and Michelle Malkin, among others.


It wasn't long ago that Aung San Suu Kyi was a human rights hero. She even won a Nobel prize. But her status only lasted until the left decided that advocating for the Islamic Nationalism of the Rohingya Islamic settlers and Jihadists in Myanmar mattered more than human rights and freedom.
And, in a short time, Aung San Suu Kyi went from being the embodiment of courageous advocacy for human rights to a horrifying villain because she dares to stand in the way of Islamic Supremacism.
The left's attacks on Aung San Suu Kyi show both the movement's hypocrisy and the impossibility of pleasing them on any terms short of utter surrender to Islamic colonization and conquest.
It's the same problem in every country..
The left claims that it wants a more left-leaning government. And then when it gets it, it's not good enough because its leaders still resist Islamic terror to some degree.
Take any of Israel's lefty leaders. None of them, Rabin, Barak, Peres, were ever good enough while they were alive because Israel still had to defend itself. 
In the US, even Obama wasn't good enough. The left constantly screeched about drone strikes.
The left's first and foremost allegiance is to Islamic Nationalism. It takes the side of Muslim terrorists against the countries that they target. And no leader of a country targeted by Muslim terrorists can ever be good enough. 
It's not democracy or human rights that the left wants. Their attacks on Aung San Suu Kyi once again make that clear. 
Their supreme ideal is Islamic Supremacism. Anyone who gets in the way of the Islamic Supremacists is the enemy.