Sunday, August 13, 2017

Rebels of Google: ‘Imagine Your Google Account Frozen on Purpose - Breitbart News Network

To read the entire item, kindly click on this link:

Rebels of Google: ‘Imagine Your Google Account Frozen on Purpose

by ALLUM BOKHARI13 Aug 2017
As part of our ongoing interview series with Google insiders, Breitbart Tech interviewed a former Google employee who warned the danger to ordinary users if authoritarian leftists gained more power and influence at the company.
The former employee (alias “Beckett”) warned that if the company continues along its current authoritarian route, as exposed by the firing of viewpoint diversity advocate James Damore, the personal data of ordinary users would be put at risk.
“Google has a lot of information about their users, and they control access to a lot of data that those users rely on. What would happen if you were suddenly locked out of your email, your YouTube and Google Play accounts, your archived photos, and all the data stored on your phone?”
“It’s hard enough to recover your account when it’s been frozen accidentally — people have actually traveled to Mountain View (California) and begged Google’s receptionists for help. Now imagine it’s been frozen on purpose.”
This was exactly what happened to Jordan Peterson, the Canadian academic and critic of identity politics. Prior to the Damore controversy, Peterson was inexplicably locked out of his Google accounts, including gmail and YouTube. (My interview with Peterson about the incident will be published in the coming week)
Speaking about the atmosphere of fear and repression highlighted by Damore’s viewpoint diversity memo, Beckett agrees that the problem is severe. He even quotes a female co-worker who said the very policies designed to help her and other “marginalized” groups made her feel less secure.
“Diversity efforts scare me, which is sad because they used to excite me. I can’t find it in my heart to recruit any more starry-eyed young women to tech companies. Our initiatives purport to ease the particular hardships for women and minority groups in tech, such as myself, but so far I have only received 1) additional stress 2) additional fear about speaking up with my experiences and opinions. … I’m afraid that people have only been nice to me so far because they make assumptions about my opinions on certain issues, and have no idea what my real thoughts are.”
Beckett recounts how an internal group of pro-free speech employees were shut down by their internal opponents, particularly Burcu Dogan, currently a software engineer at the company’s Mountain View headquarters.
“Someone set up a mailing list called “freespeech” to discuss the problem that would later be called the “ideological echo chamber.” Immediately, it became the butt of jokes, the same lazy “hurr hurr freeze peach” snickering you’d expect from true believers on Twitter.”
“But one person, Burcu Dogan, decided to go further and flood the group with spam. After her posts were deleted and she was banned, she made up a story about how the group “promotes hate speech and violence against people” and demanded that Google investigate who was running it.”
“Outside that group, Burcu wrote posts describing the people who spoke up against arbitrary firings as “men debating about false accusations and their legal implications” who were consumed by “daily masturbation about your manly problems… This is how your brain works … I don’t feel safe at Google anymore.”
Within months, the owners of that group were fired or forced out. She’s still there. I guess she was safe after all.”
Once Google managers decide they want to purge a “wrong-thinker,” says Beckett, they use a firing process that enables them “without exposing their real – political – reasons for doing so.
“Once the company has decided they don’t want someone around, the usual way to get rid of them is to put them on a PIP (“performance improvement plan”), which highlights areas where they aren’t living up to the formal job expectations for their position and sets specific goals for them to achieve.”
“The expectations are written vaguely enough in the first place that a manager can always come up with an argument that someone isn’t quite meeting them — if those expectations were enforced to the letter, almost everyone would be fired after their first review.”
“The whole process takes 2-3 months, and it’s basically just a way to generate a paper trail to guard against wrongful termination suits. If someone claims they were fired for discriminatory reasons, Google can point to the PIP as evidence that they weren’t.”
Beckett is not optimistic about the potential for a competitor to Google. He points out that Voat, Reddit’s free-speech alternative, failed to kill off the original. He says the only real option to tackle a company of Google’s size and power is for the legal and political system to take action.
“There aren’t enough people willing to switch over this,” he says.
This article is part of the “Rebels of Google” series. Read the rest of the series here. 
You can follow Allum Bokhari on and add him on Facebook. Email tips and suggestions to