Saturday, December 14, 2019

David Collier: Community leaders must understand there's no building bridges with @uklabour. Corbynism embedded by pushing new toxic candidates in safe seats. They must go. There are lists of them. Ignoring them means we allow the #antisemitism to survive with a promise of return. #NeverAgain



David Collier

@mishtal

Jew. Zionist. Pro-west. Rising antisemitism mobilised me. Balance is not half-way between the truth and a lie.

Julia MacFarlane: Baroness Tonge of the House of Lords, blaming Jeremy Corbyn’s defeat on “the pro-Israel lobby”.



Julia MacfarlaneVerifierat konto

@juliamacfarlane

 foreign affairs reporter | London Leadership Council  |   alum |  alum | Views mine. đŸŽó §ó ąó łó Łó Žó żđŸ‡Č🇹
julia.macfarlane@abc.com

Friday, December 13, 2019

Europe Elects: Sweden, Sifo poll

Europe Elects

@EuropeElects


Poll aggregation and election analysis for countries in the European Union.   Support us: 

Raymond Ibrahim: Jihad and Criminality: Inseparable Bedfellows

https://www.raymondibrahim.com/2019/12/11/jihad-and-criminality-inseparable-bedfellows/

Jihad and Criminality: Inseparable Bedfellows

It’s official: Islamic jihad and generic criminality are intimately connected.
According to an earlier UK study:
The lines between terrorism and criminality are becoming blurred as an increasing number of former criminals join the Islamic State… Nearly 60 percent of European jihadists studied by researchers had been jailed previously… Once recruited by ISIS, these people easily transition to committing violence for a different cause… [T]he welcome from ISIS offers criminals a perceived chance at “redemption” without requiring a change in behavior.
Even so, the establishment refuses to see any direct correlation between Islam and criminality. As the director of the study himself explained, criminals “are the perfect fit” because the “Islamic State doesn’t require any intellectual sophistication. It doesn’t ask you to study religion. It makes it all like a computer game.” In other words, criminals are ideal recruits because they don’t know — nor do they care to learn — the first thing about “true” Islam.
Or, as John Brennan memorably asserted of ISIS members when he was head of the CIA, “they’re criminals. Most — many — of them are psychopathic thugs, murderers who use a religious concept and masquerade and mask themselves in that religious construct.”
Here, again, we see how ignorance of history — willful or otherwise — undermines Western security. The fact is, from the very beginnings of Islam and throughout the centuries, the overwhelming majority of Muslims who participated in jihads had no “intellectual sophistication,” did not “study religion,” and generally behaved like “psychopathic thugs, murderers.” That’s because Islam’s “religious construct” was always designed to entice and mobilize such men.
All this is evident in the career of Islam’s prophet, Muhammad. After more than a decade of peaceful preaching in Mecca, he had won over only some 100 followers, mostly relatives. Once, however, he took to raiding and plundering all who rejected his Islam — and became immensely successful at it — his followers grew exponentially.
Then and now, those who undertook jihad were never obligated to have sincere or pious intentions. That’s because — and despite all Western projectionism and relativism — Allah is not God; he is not interested in the “condition” of the jihadist’s “heart,” but rather in his sword. The cold, businesslike language of the Koran makes this clear. Whoever commits to the jihad makes a “fine loan to Allah,” which the latter guarantees to pay back “many times over,” always commensurate with the jihadist’s efforts (Koran 2:245, 4:95).
Or as Koran 9:111 succinctly declares: “Allah has bought from the believers their lives and worldly goods, and in return has promised them Paradise: they shall fight in the way of Allah and shall kill and be killed… Rejoice then in the bargain you have struck, for that is the supreme triumph.”
In short, any Muslim can join and reap the rewards of jihad — including by plundering, raping, and enslaving non-Muslims — so long as their “efforts” (literally, jihad) are seen as somehow empowering or benefitting Islam. Fighting in Islam’s service — with the risk of dying — was and is all the proof of piety ever needed. Indeed, sometimes fighting has precedence over piety: many dispensations, including not upholding the obligatory prayers and fasting, are granted those who participate in jihad. Ottoman sultans were actually forbidden from going on pilgrimage to Mecca — an otherwise individual obligation for all Muslims — simply because doing so could jeopardize the annual jihad
Consider the Ottoman sultan Mehmet II. He was a notorious pedophile, homosexual, and drunkard; he also had a sadistic side, and perfected the art of impalement. Regardless, he is honored by Muslims around the world — virtually venerated in Turkey — because he was also a successful jihadist and conqueror of Constantinople.
Similarly, Mecca’s tribal elites, Khalid bin al-Walid and Abu Sufyan had for years mocked, mistreated, and eventually evicted Muhammad from Mecca. When he returned a decade later as conqueror, they were among the first to proclaim the shahada, enter the fold of Islam, and become among Muhammad’s closest companions. Otherwise, not much changed.
Khalid (now known as the “Sword of Allah”) continued to engage in the sorts of atrocities that troubled even fellow Muslims — such as slaughtering a Muslim man on the false accusation that he had apostatized, cooking his head, and raping his wife. As for Abu Sufyan, he merely called on the Arabs to “jihad in the way of Allah” in Christian Syria, so that, in his words, they might “seize their lands and cities, and enslave their children and women.”
Whatever their backstories, both Khalid and Sufyan are revered within Islamic historiography because, like Ottoman sultan Mehmet II, they were committed to the jihad, which — even if they “exploited” it for their own gain — also helped expand Islam.
Such was the genius of Muhammad: in the Arabian tribalism of his day, members of one’s extended tribe were as inviolable as non-members were violable. Muhammad took this idea and infused it with a pious rationale. Henceforth there would only be two “tribes” in the world: the umma — which consists of all Muslims, whose blood is vouchsafed — and the “infidels,” who exist to be plundered, enslaved, or killed with impunity, for rejecting Allah.
This also explains why other tribal peoples — Turks and Tatars — also converted to and found Islam compatible with their lives. “[I]f taking lives and ravaging the lands of the infidel were the means by which the ends of expanding Islam were served, then the new converts’ traditional pleasures were now happily endowed with a pious rationale,” writes one historian on the Turks’ conversion to Islam. Similarly, “the Tartars had adopted Islam because it was the easy religion, as Christianity was the hard one,” observed a fourteenth-century European. Whereas Islam complemented the tribal way of life, Christianity only challenged it.
Thomas Aquinas (d. 1274) summarized the matter thusly: “He [Muhammad] seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh urges us… and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men.”
Today, not much has changed. Characterizing modern-day jihadists as “criminals,” “psychopathic thugs,” and “murderers” — as if “authentic” jihadists were ever anything more noble — is at best redundant, at worst dangerously misleading.
For many more examples of criminal jihadists throughout history, see Ibrahim’s Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West

About

RAYMOND IBRAHIM is a widely published author, public speaker, and Middle East and Islam specialist.  His books include Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (Da Capo, 2018), Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (Regnery, 2013), and The Al Qaeda Reader (Doubleday, 2007).
Ibrahim’s writings, translations, and observations have appeared in a variety of publications, including the New York Times Syndicate, CNN, LA Times, Fox News, Financial Times, Jerusalem Post, United Press International, USA Today, Washington Post, Washington Times, and Weekly Standard; scholarly journals, including the Almanac of Islamism, Chronicle of Higher Education, Hoover Institution’s Strategika, Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst, Middle East Quarterly, and Middle East Review of International Affairs; and popular websites, including American Thinker, Bloomberg, Breitbart, Christian Post, Daily Caller, FrontPage Magazine, NewsMax, National Review Online, PJ Media, and World Magazine. He has contributed chapters to several anthologies and has been translated into dozens of languages.
Among other media, he has appeared on MSNBC, Fox News, C-SPAN, PBS, Reuters, Al-Jazeera, and NPR; he has done hundreds of radio interviews and some of his YouTube videos (here and here for example) have received over a million views each.
Ibrahim guest lectures at universities, including the National Defense Intelligence College, has briefed governmental agencies, such as U.S. Strategic Command and the Defense Intelligence Agency, provides expert testimony for Islam-related lawsuits, and has testified before Congress regarding the conceptual failures that dominate American discourse concerning Islam and the worsening plight of Egypt’s Christian Copts.
Ibrahim’s dual-background—born and raised in the U.S. by Egyptian parents born and raised in the Middle East—has provided him with unique advantages, from equal fluency in English and Arabic, to an equal understanding of the Western and Middle Eastern mindsets, positioning him to explain the latter to the former. His interest in Islamic civilization was first piqued when he began visiting the Middle East as a child in the 1970s. Interacting and conversing with the locals throughout the decades has provided him with an intimate appreciation for that part of the world, complementing his academic training.
After a brief athletic career—including winning the 1993 NPC Los Angeles Bodybuilding Championship as a teenager—Raymond went on to receive his B.A. and M.A. (both in History, focusing on the ancient and medieval Near East, with dual-minors in Philosophy and Literature) from California State University, Fresno. There he studied closely with noted military-historian Victor Davis Hanson. He also took graduate courses at Georgetown University’s Center for Contemporary Arab Studies—including classes on the history, politics, and economics of the Arab world—and studied Medieval Islam and Semitic languages at Catholic University of America. His M.A. thesis examined an early military encounter between Islam and Byzantium based on arcane Arabic and Greek texts.
Ibrahim’s resume includes serving as an Arabic language and regional specialist at the Near East Section of the Library of Congress, where he was often contacted by and provided information to defense and intelligence personnel involved in the fields of counterterrorism and area studies, as well as the Congressional Research Service; and serving as associate director of the Middle East Forum, a Philadelphia think tank.
He also often functions as a journalist and has been a Media Fellow at the Hoover Institution and news analyst for a variety of media.  His knowledge of Arabic and familiarity with Middle Eastern sources have enabled him to offer breaking news.  Days before the Obama administration blamed an anti-Islamic movie for Muslim uprisings against a U.S. consul and an embassy in Libya and Egypt respectively, Ibrahim showed that the demonstrations were pre-planned and unrelated to the movie.  Similarly, he was first to expose an Arabic-language Saudi fatwa that called for the destruction of any Christian church found on the Arabian Peninsula.
Raymond Ibrahim is currently Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center; Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute; and Judith Friedman Rosen Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

Ledarsidorna.se: Det positiva med det brittiska parlamentsvalet Àr att det blir en exit för en av europas mest inflytelserika antisemiter , Jeremy Corbyn, frÄn brittisk politik. Det Àr en av de riktigt goda nyheterna. NÄgot som @socialdemokrat bör vÀrdera noga. #svpol

Ledarsidorna.se

@ledarsidorna_se


Oberoende liberalkonservativ. Alltid i opposition.
Sweden

President Donald J. Trump: Record Stock Market & Jobs!

Donald J. TrumpVerifierat konto

@realDonaldTrump


45th President of the United States of AmericađŸ‡ș🇾
Washington, DC

Sussex Friends of Israel: I am completely out of words for this cantankerous, vile, old man. Only @KenLoachSixteen could take a defeat such as this and make it worse by blaming the Jews. Horrible, nasty antisemite.

SussexFriendsofIsrael

@SussexFriends

We are SFI Sussex Friends of Israel RT's don't necessarily = endorsement 
Sussex UK

Vlad Tepes Blog: Interview with ex-Muslim and former Islamic jurist Sam Solomon on the Mosque in Islam and Islamic Migration (called Hijra)



https://www.amazon.com/Modern-Day-Trojan-Horse-Immigration/dp/0979492955

Modern Day Trojan Horse: Al-Hijra, the Islamic Doctrine of Immigration, Accepting Freedom or Imposing Islam?

by Sam Solomon and Elias Al Maqdisi

The first fundamental principle for the creation of a successfully visible Islamic society is to be separate and distinct... 

"Sam Solomon and E Al Maqdisi have provided the general Western public a valuable service in publishing this book." Rev Dr Patrick Sookhdeo Director of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity "If only one piece of information pertaining to Muslims and Islam is ever read, it would be this book on Al-Hijra." N Keas Phd Lecturer and Communication Consultant 

"I hope that every person in the Western world reads it, including the sleeping political elite. This book should bring about a much needed awakening." Geert Wilders MP Chairman Party for Freedom (PVV) 

Sam Solomon, a convert to Christianity and an expert on Islam, is a senior lecturer and research coordinator, a human rights activist and an advisor to British as well as European parliamentarians. Sam has authored a number of thought-provoking books and numerous articles on Christian Muslim relations. E Al Maqdisi is a prolific writer and debater, an author of some 15 books, and a regular contributor to many Internet sites on this complex subject of Islam and its teachings.


The Mosque Exposed 


by Sam Solomon


If you don't think The Mosque has any bearing on your life - think again! Discover the Islamic view of life and religion, the purpose of a mosque, and how it will affect every human being on the earth. So be prepared! This detailed and well-documented look at a religion most of us are not that familiar with will provoke, challenge and enlighten your view of Islam in the world today. The authors provide a challenging work that needs to be taken seriously by Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

https://vladtepesblog.com/the-agenda-and-views-of-this-site/


Islam is a religious political and cultural system. Its no more deserving of protection than that of Nazism or Communism with which, by the way, it shares a great deal. Islam is not a race and therefore criticism of it is not racist.

-Vlad Tepes Blog

Channel 4, Dispatches - Undercover Mosque 2 - The Return (2008)

Channel 4, Dispatches: Undercover Mosque (2007)






Apostate Prophet: How Muslim Missionaries Trick People (about 18 minutes)



In the name of Dawah (inviting people to Islam), people and groups that seek to expand Islam tend to stick to certain approaches and strategies, and those strategies don't always present questionable Islamic matters the right way.

-Apostate Prophet Support AP: https://apostateprophet.com/donate/ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/apostateprophet Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/apostateprophet AP Merchandise: https://merch.apostateprophet.com/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/ApostateRidvan Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theapostatep... Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/apos... (auto-upload) Intro & Outro Visual + Intro Music, made by Egyptian Atheist (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpy7...)

Pierre Rehov: Pay Per Slay - Palestinian Authority Incitement

Pierre-REHOV

@PRehov


Filmmaker, novelist. Spent 19 ys debunking Palestinian lies and propaganda. Interviewed 47 Muslim terrorists. Peace will come when lies will stop.
Israel - USA

Roz Rothstein

@RozRothstein


CEO and co-founder of 
International

Lauren Southern: South Africa The Truth #farmlands (about 40 minutes)



WARNING: Graphic scenes depicted in this edit. (UNDERCOVER REPORTING) This is an edited version of a full documentary that will be launched in the very soon future. What is happening in SA and why? Since 1993, SA has become an unstable 3rd world country where white south africans have been targeted. Murders and raping of white south africans has become the norm in SA, and therefore the big Exodus out of SA. Here is some victim accounts of daily incidents in SA.

https://laurensouthern.net/farmlands/


Lauren SouthernVerifierat konto

@Lauren_Southern

Best Selling Author. Lover of hedgehogs & Freedom. Retweets ≠ endorsement. 
contactlsouthern@gmail.com

Jan Milld, Förintelsen och judarna

Förintelsen Ă€r ett historisk faktum enligt den hĂ€r bloggen, IceViking.

Förintelseförnekelse Àr bÄde avskyvÀrt och farligt (enligt den hÀr bloggens uppfattning bör det dock inte vara brottsligt dÄ det utgör en alltför stor inskrÀnkning av yttrandefriheten).

Jan Milld, tidigare partisekreterare för Sverigedemokraterna och sedan mÄnga Är aktiv med opinionsbildning pÄ nÀtet har uttalat sig en hel del rörande Förintelsen, judar och nÀrliggande Àmnen.

Jan Milld medverkar tydligen Àven med ett kapitel i den relativt nya boken "Priset - en antologi om att komma ut ur garderoben" av Karl-Olov Arnstberg och Gunnar Sandelin.

SamhĂ€llsnytt, som rekommenderade boken, skrev bl.a. följande om boken:

Karl-Olov Arnstberg, vĂ€lkĂ€nd för böckerna ”Invandring och mörklĂ€ggning” tillsammans med författarkollegan Gunnar Sandelin, har i dagarna slĂ€ppt antologi dĂ€r tolv av Sveriges mest profilerade kritiker av massinvandring och multikulturalism berĂ€ttar om vad det kostat dem att som opinionsbildare stĂ„ upp för sina Ă„sikter.

...

Medverkar med varsitt kapitel i boken gör:
K-O Arnstberg
Ingrid Björkman
Marika Formgren
Ingrid Carlqvist
Jan Milld
Jonathan Friedman
Julia Caesar
Kajsa Ekholm Friedman
Mats Dagerlind
Anna Hagwall
Jan Sjunnesson
Gunnar Sandelin

...
KĂ€lla: https://samnytt.se/priset-en-antologi-om-att-komma-ut-ur-pk-garderoben/

Boken har Àven recenserats i SamhÀllsnytthttps://samnytt.se/bokrecension-priset-av-karl-olov-arnstberg-m-fl/

FrÄn SamhÀllsnytts recension av boken:


Karl-Olov Arnstberg har gett ut ett flertal böcker som förklarar vad som hĂ€nder i Sverige. I sin senaste bok ”Priset”, som kom ut strax före jul, berĂ€ttar han tillsammans med 11 medförfattare om det pris de har fĂ„tt betala för att gĂ„ emot strömmen i invandringsfrĂ„gan.
FrĂ„n början lĂ€r tanken ha varit att kalla boken ”Priset för att ha en ryggrad” vilket tydliggör vad det handlar om. Författarna har gemensamt, att de har stĂ„tt upp och ifrĂ„gasatt de stora förĂ€ndringar som Sverige har genomgĂ„tt, vilka Ă€r kopplade till mĂ„ngkultur och invandring.
...
IceViking vill med detta givetvis inte anklaga nÄgon för nÄgot den personen inte stÄr för sjÀlv. Utan bara Äterge denna observation som fÄr stÄ utan kommentar.
För ett antal Är sedan blev den hÀr bloggaren efter kritik av Jan Milld rörande ovanstÄnde Àmnen anklagad för bÄde det ena och det andra. Kritiken som publicerades pÄ engelska under titeln "Jan Milld is a Holocaust-denier" bestod i huvudsak av att översÀtta Jan Millds egna ord pÄ svenska till engelska (dessa översÀttningar Àr tyvÀrr raderade).

HÀr Àr lÀnkar till pÄ den hÀr bloggen Ätergivet material som Jan Milld publicerat vid tiden för min kritik:

https://icevikings.blogspot.com/2016/03/den-riktiga-jan-milld-jan-milld-tva.html

https://icevikings.blogspot.com/2015/10/den-riktiga-jan-milld-avslojad-i.html

https://icevikings.blogspot.com/2015/11/den-riktiga-jan-milld-jan-milld-vad-far.html

Nya lÀnkar till material postat av Jan Milld sjÀlv anges ocksÄ nedan:

https://janmilld.wordpress.com/2015/05/19/6-miljoner/

6 miljoner?


https://janmilld.wordpress.com/2014/01/07/tyska-lardomar/

Tyska lÀrdomar


http://www.janmilld.se/millt/v20.html
Förintelser

https://janmilld.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/avsnitt-7-forintelsen-och-antisemitism/

Avsnitt 7: Förintelsen och antisemitism


http://www.janmilld.se/ms00/v32.html
Har judar makt?

Nedan följder Àven Jan Millds och Anders Sundholms recension i "BlÄgula frÄgor" av Lars Adelskoghs bok "En tom sÀck kan inte stÄ":

http://www.bgf.nu/kampanjer/tom.html

Vad fĂ„r diskuteras?
En bok har inkommit till BGF-redaktionen för recension. Det Ă€r Lars Adelskoghs bok "En tom sĂ€ck kan inte stĂ„", utgiven pĂ„ Nordiska förlaget 2002. (Pris 199 kr, pg 365682-4). Ämnet Ă€r "Förintelsen" och Adelskogh presenterar "revisionistiska" stĂ„ndpunker. Ska en sĂ„dan bok recenseras, ska sĂ„dant Ă€gnas uppmĂ€rksamhet? Är inte fakta i detta Ă€mne redan fastslagna och med rĂ„ge bevisade?
BGF:s egen erfarenhet Ă€r hur Ă€ven mĂ„ttfull kritik av svensk invandringspolitik kan göra att en bok inte blir recenserad i massmedia. Spontant bjuder det oss emot ett medverka till ett förtigande av andra böcker, som tar upp viktiga Ă€mnen.
Vi vĂ€ljer dĂ€rför att recensera boken "En tom sĂ€ck kan inte stĂ„". Ă„ven om man har svĂ„rt att ta till sig allt som Adelskogh dĂ€r skriver finns skĂ€l att diskutera boken. Enormt utrymme har ju, genom inte minst regeringskampanjer de senaste Ă„ren, Ă€gnats  "Förintelsen". Kretsarna bakom detta kampanjande mĂ„ste rimligen anse att Adelskogh Ă€r helt fel ute. Har han raktigenom fel bör det inte vara svĂ„rt för dem att pĂ„visa detta.
Med andra ord: fakta och argument ska mötas med fakta och argument. I just denna frĂ„ga hotar en EU-lagstiftning, med förbud av varje ifrĂ„gasĂ€ttande. Det Ă€r oroande. Vad blir dĂ„ nĂ€sta Ă€mne för diskussions- och tankeförbud?
Över till boken. I begreppet "Förintelsen" lĂ€ggs tre moment:
a) Tyskarnas planmÀssiga mördande av judar 1941 till 1944.
b) AnvÀndandet av gaskammare för ÀndamÄlet.
c) Sex miljoner dödade som resultat.
IfrĂ„gasĂ€ttande av ens delar av nĂ„got av dessa tre moment har renderat fördömanden, etikettering som "revisionist" samt repressalier i form av yrkesförbud och liknande. Lars Adelskogh gör inte desto mindre en genomgĂ„ng av invĂ€ndningar som rests frĂ„n "revisionistiskt" hĂ„ll.  Hans utgĂ„ngspunkt Ă€r denna:
"Det har blivit ett talessÀtt att 'förintelsen'... Àr alla tiders vÀrsta brott mot mÀnskligheten. Om sÄ vore fallet, borde det dÄ inte vara desto viktigare att göra alla tiders bÀsta mordutredning skaffa fram alla slags bevis för detta brott, att vÀrdera dem och med sÄ strÀngt vetenskapliga metoder som möjligt komma fram till absolut visshet om fakta i mÄlet?"
Adelskogh hĂ€vdar att sĂ„ inte skett. Han talar om tre former av bevis - a) sakbevis (tekniska bevis) b) dokumentbevis  c) vittnesbevis - och menar att brister finns betrĂ€ffande samtliga. 
En Sanning har Ă€ndĂ„ slagits fast, en sanning som inte fĂ„r ifrĂ„gasĂ€ttas.  Inte desto mindre har denna sanning förskjutits. Det som var sant om "Förintelsen" för 50 Ă„r sedan Ă€r det inte lĂ€ngre idag, och för denna förskjutning har företrĂ€dare för den officiella sanningen stĂ„tt. "Exterministerna" som Adelskogh kallar dem.
Innan vi gĂ„r vidare - för att undvika missförstĂ„nd - vad revisionisterna har synpunkter kring gĂ€ller bara de tre momenten ovan. Adelskogh:  "Vad revisionisterna dĂ€remot inte förnekar Ă€r att tyskarna utsatte etniska minoriteter, i synnerhet judar, för förföljelser, berövade dem deras egendom, fördrev dem, satte dem i koncentrationslĂ€ger och tvĂ„ngsarbete."  Uppenbarligen förnekar revisionisterna inte heller att miljoner judar faktiskt mördades, genom avrĂ€ttningar eller systematiska umbĂ€randen.
Den som verkligen vill ta del av Lars Adelskogs uppgifter ska naturligtvis lÀsa boken, hÀr bara nÄgra exempel:
A. 6 miljoner dödade judar totalt, det Ă€r en officiell siffra. Hur stĂ€mmer den med förĂ€ndringen av antalet dödade i Auschwitz? Först fanns dĂ€r minnestavlor med uppgift om 4 miljoner dödade. 1990 ersattes dessa med uppgifter om 1,5 miljonder dödade i Auschwitz, alltsĂ„ 2,5 miljoner fĂ€rre. Om de 4 miljonerna ingick i totalsiffran 6 miljoner bör den senare rimligen ocksĂ„ revideras, till ca 3,5 miljoner.
B. FrĂ„n början var det en sanning att gaskamrar förekommit i koncentrationslĂ€ger inte bara i Polen utan Ă€ven pĂ„ rikstyskt omrĂ„de. Nu hĂ€vdas inte lĂ€ngre detta, nu gĂ€ller detta bara ett antal lĂ€ger i det tyskockuperade Polen.
C. Uppgifter om hur mĂ„nga offer som trĂ€ngts in i gaskamrar Ă„t gĂ„ngen skulle ha betytt 10-19 personer per kvadratmeter. Adelskog frĂ„gar: varför dĂ„ anvĂ€nda gas, varför inte bara lĂ„ta offren dö av kvĂ€vning? GasanvĂ€ndningen skulle, skriver han, ha betytt avsevĂ€rda risker för dem som hanterade processen.
Spontant kan man ju tycka att det Àr sekundÀrt om det dödades 6 eller 2 miljoner judar, sekundÀrt om det skedde pÄ det ena eller det andra sÀttet. Det Àr under alla omstÀndigheter illa nog.
Men hÀr finns dock en annan - och viktig! - aspekt. FrÄgor om historia och politik ska kunna diskuteras öppet, faktauppgifter ska kunna utsÀttas för vetenskaplig granskning. UpprÀttas tankeförbud pÄ ett omrÄde kan detta börja sprida sig, och dÄ Àr ett samhÀlle farligt ute.
 
Klart Ă€r att vissa maktgrupper har intresse av att vi alla ska kĂ€nna en skuld gentemot judar i allmĂ€nhet. Det ger möjligheter till ekonomisk utpressning  och det underlĂ€ttar de pĂ„gĂ„ende övergreppen mot palestinierna. Det kan ocksĂ„ kopplas till svensk invandringskritik och anvĂ€ndas till mentalt förtryck.
Jan Milld Anders Sundholm